Persuasion at the Rosemary Branch theatre was a good adaptation of Austen’s work but grew tiresome as time passed by. Austen was an excellent novelist whose literature is still incredibly popular. As such, Bryony J. Thompson has focused almost too much on the words and forgotten about the other elements of theatre. It made the play almost futile knowing that the more developed novel was available to read. The actors were good but, with almost two hours of listening to lines delivered in the third person, their performances became monotonous. The set and costume did not help, either. Each actor was dressed in cream coloured clothing, using cream coloured props whilst standing on a stage that was also painted cream. Some may say that this neutral colouring allowed the actors to mould the set and story through their performances. Instead, it dulled the characters and their tale.
Rose McPhilemy (Anne Elliott) stood out as a particularly strong character whose performance managed to add colour to the repetitive play. I believe that that this was because the development of her character was linear without any interruption from a character change. The other actors were very good but none of the characters seemed whole due to the multiple characters they played and the continuous quick changes between them.
Theatre is about sound, visuals and the words themselves. This play did not seem to be fully focused on making itself visually and aurally appealing. The language was engaging, however, so credit to Bryony for keeping Austen’s words alive.
The play ended on a high with music and dance associated with the period. But this dancing at the end was the only part of the play that seemed to make a dent in its repetitive atmosphere.
If you love Austen, you will enjoy (and even love) this play. The language is beautiful and flows seamlessly. But if you are a general theatre lover, you will be disappointed by the lack of attention given to everything but the words .
Athena Stevens is a talented woman who created and stars in a 90 minute play that travels across decades exploring the changing attitudes of society. Schism begins when 14 year old Katherine (Stevens) breaks into her teacher’s home just as he is about to commit suicide. She is desperate to learn more and develop to her full potential and this youthful persistence is what prevents Harrison (Tim Beckman) from taking his own life. Katherine dreams of being an architect whilst Harrison lives life regretting that he gave up on that same dream. As the years go by, the two fall in love facing several difficulties including the idea of a ‘student – teacher’ relationship. But the problems are rooted deeper. When Katherine becomes a successful architect, despite all the odds, Harrison cannot handle her success.
Jealousy is one human emotion that is integral to the play and its outcome. The feeling of embarrassment is another obstacle that prevents Harrison from being able to love Katherine with a confident and care free manner. Amongst all these complexities, Katherine has cerebral palsy; a disability that Harrison is never fully able to overlook. Public comments that imply Harrison’s intentions are perverted become a hindrance to his ability to see Katherine simply as the woman of his affections. This play is incredibly clever and highlights that cerebral palsy does not have to be the weakness that society says it is. Katherine is an incredibly strong and intelligent individual who knows what she wants and how to get it. Her disability does not make her stupid or unaware of her surroundings. Her judgement is as sharp as anyone else’s. It is not cerebral palsy that is a barrier to her future but society’s attitude towards it. Her school decide that she is incapable of taking classes with non-disabled students; universities assume she wouldn’t be able to handle a degree. Katherine’s confidence and diligence breaks down these assumptions and proves her abilities to be as good as and better than anyone else with or without a disability.
Schism is a valuable play that needs to be seen by all. At the end of the play, Harrison is incredibly unhappy despite his ‘normal’ human brain and body. But Katherine is an absolute success. This is not a fairytale type story that shows what life could be like in another Universe. It proves what life can and should be like if non-disabled humans were less narrow-minded. There will be many audience members who would have made assumptions about people with disabilities only to find that Stevens has picked these out and thrown them in the trash. When watching this play, one comes to realise just how restrictive society can be to people with disabilities. People with little or no understanding of someone think that they are entitled to define their abilities through comments and opinions that are based upon trivialities. Despite this, Schism is not a play purely about disability. It is about having the overall ability to do what you want whether you have a disability or not. Harrison did not achieve his dreams because his own mentality got in the way. Katherine achieved hers because she never let anyone else define her.
The Baron’s Court Theatre is host to a satirical play that made me desperate to read the book that inspired it. Vladimir Nabokov’s literary work is successfully projected onto the stage by Act Provocateur International. Invitation to a Beheading is a dystopian piece that manages to take the audience out of the society that they know and displace them into a fictional, slightly distorted, world. This play explores the feeling of isolation, loneliness, helplessness and a loss of control in a world that does not seem to make sense. Consisting of 2 Acts and set in a prison, The Baron’s Court Theatre provides the perfect setting for such a play. What used to be the pub’s cellar is ideal for reflecting the dark, cold, isolation of the prison cell.
In this fictional society, the likeable Cincinnatus has been put in prison for a crime that is never described or made known to the audience. Cincinnatus does not seem to even know himself why he is there. The entire duration of the play sees Cincinnatus prepare for his upcoming beheading whilst enduring games of mental cruelty initiated by both the workers of the prison and his own family. The audience is never sure what is real or what should be believed.
Despite the sinister undertones, this is a very quirky piece of theatre with a well chosen cast full of distinct and memorable characters. Garry Voss, playing Cincinnatus, was perfect for his lead role. His performance was incredibly natural and believable and despite being on stage for the entire duration of the production, his energy never faltered. The audience were physically touched by his expressions of helplessness and frustration; his innocence was refreshing and allowed the audience to fully empathise with his character; and he performed convincingly both through his intonations and also through his authentic body language. Voss exuded a charming star quality that I was not expecting to find in such a small and under-appreciated venue.
Invitation to a Beheading is a lively, colourful, socio-political play full of great characters and a story designed to make the audience think. If you like George Orwell, Franz Kafka or generally just a good piece of literary theatre then you must book tickets to see this before the final show on 24th April 2016: http://www.offwestend.com/index.php/theatres/book/42?play=14125
Douglas Rintoul makes his directorial Queen’s debut with an easy to follow adaptation of Shakespeare’s popular comedy. A talented cast with a skilful understanding of comic timing, combined with Rintoul’s direction, has led this production of Much Ado About Nothing to its delightful success.
Set in World War 2, this version emphasises the timelessness of Shakespeare’s imagination. By contrasting Shakespearean language with an era not too far from the modern day, the audience are able to contextualise the play in a way that is more relatable to contemporary life. In particular, this production would be greatly appreciated by those studying the play for it allows individuals who may not necessarily be interested in Shakespeare’s text to engage with his work in a more entertaining and visual form. The night I attended this humorous piece, there were several school groups watching with intent that went on to enthusiastically discuss Much Ado About Nothing at the end of the show. The barrier between modern and Shakespearean language became non-existent due to the talented performances by the actors and the excellent direction from Rintoul.
What was refreshing about this particular production was the size of the cast. Rather than having actors take on more roles than traceable, eleven actors and a few extras were employed to add a sense of community and to lift the atmosphere of the auditorium. Hattie Ladbury’s (Beatrice) and James Siggens’ (Claudio) performances particularly stood out. It would not be an exaggeration to say that Ladbury’s presence filled each scene with an unmistakable personality and charisma. Every time she stepped on stage a bubble of comical wit followed her, causing the audience to laugh more than any other cast member. Whilst Ladbury’s character sustained a constant and engrossing energy, Siggens proved his diverse acting ability through his character’s changing personality. On first introduction, Claudio is a cheeky and charming character who puts his heart out on the line for Hero. But this all changes when a plot twist occurs, keeping both the audience and the characters on their toes. Due to information that suggests Hero has been unfaithful, Claudio transforms from a happy and sparkling young man to a stern, unapproachable, individual. This change is sublime and fills the auditorium with an unmistakable chill.
This is not a difficult to understand piece aimed at Shakespeare enthusiasts. It is an accessible production for those who are interested in seeing a laugh out loud comedy about love and betrayal. If you like to fill your nights with fun, laughter and culture then tickets can be bought until Saturday 26th March 2016 at http://www.queens-theatre.co.uk/show/880/much-ado-about-nothing
The Hope Theatre’s adaptation of Sophocles’ Antigone made audiences feel as though they had transferred to a post-apocalyptic future. Police sirens and sound effects with connotations of political unrest became the soundtrack to this 60 minute piece of theatre. If you are not already aware of the story of Antigone or the story of Oedipus (which is rather relevant to the play), Brendon Murray wrote the script to include a cleverly executed introduction. For anyone who is not so familiar with Greek theatre, this summary makes the piece seamlessly easy to follow.
Performed by a 5 piece all-female cast, Antigone explores the issue of having the right to bury the deceased. Antigone loses two brothers in battle and is denied the burial of one of them (Polynices) because he is deemed to be a traitor. Disrespecting the King’s law, Antigone sets out to make sure that both her brothers are given the sacred burials she feels they deserve.
This hour long play investigates the consequences of defying absolute law for the sake of family loyalty and respect for the dead. With a fusion between ancient and modern theatre, Brendon Murray makes sure to keep the Greek chorus an integral part of the piece. It was exciting to see such a heavy emphasis on the choral components; powerful five-part harmonies accentuated each scene drawing attention to the important themes of the play.
This adaptation is worth seeing if you want to witness 5 strong women taking on a multitude of diverse characters with convincing and memorable performances. Do not groan at an all female cast but celebrate their rare ability to tell a story with as much conviction as a mixed gender production.
Unexpected Opera have made Wagner’s ‘Ring Cycle’ more accessible with its newly reduced version showing at the Charing Cross Theatre. The Rinse Cycle is a production that attempts to squeeze 16 hours of Wagner’s work into just 2 hours. Aiming to please audiences that would not consider themselves to be opera fans, Unexpected Opera use an educational tone to simplify and explain Wagner’s work.
A cast of 5 established opera singers accompanied by a talented pianist take the audience on a journey through Wagner’s 4 operas. Approximately half an hour is allocated to each opera with some beautiful musical pieces laced throughout. Vocal performances by Simon Thorpe and Edward Hughes are particularly notable; their voices resonated with the audience long after the performance had ended.
Described as a comedy, puns and simple jokes are used to break the tension and intensity of the traditional opera. Set in a launderette with washing machines that emit bubbles and spin, this is not a show for those who take themselves too seriously; laughter bubbled out of the audiences’ mouths throughout the cycle of the show.
To enjoy this production it is not necessary to know much about Wagner’s work but it was noticeable that some scenes had secondary meanings that only a clued up opera fan would be able to understand. In addition, the comedy seemed to be aimed at the middle aged with the use of unoriginal and predictable jokes. It is a chaotic and arguably fun production that is structurally similar to a pantomime with cast members breaking the fourth wall and encouraging audience participation.
For fans of opera who also have a funny bone, a visit to the Charing Cross Theatre would make for a great night out but I am unconvinced that this production is going to create a new generation of opera enthusiasts. However, if you want a quick lesson on Wagner and opera then this may be the quickest and most entertaining way to do so.
To experience Wagner’s Ring Cycle in an original form you can buy tickets for performances up until 12th March 2016:
The Spanish Tragedy at the Old Red Lion Theatre (Islington) is a very good adaptation of Thomas Kyd’s work. With a theme of revenge, the audience follow Horatio’s mother who sets herself the task of avenging her son’s death. To make the play all the more exciting, the character, Revenge, meddles in events causing unjustifiable deaths leading the play to a chaotic end.
The set was quite alternative, abstract and sterile making this particular adaptation of Kyd’s Spanish Tragedy very interesting to observe. At the time the play was first produced, busy sets and colourful more elaborate costumes would have been used. In this production the costumes were simple and the majority of the cast wore black. The floor was white and there were menacing hooks hanging from the ceiling. There was a sort of white-noise playing throughout the entire piece. The lighting reminded one of an old psychiatric hospital; sanitary, neutral, and occasionally flickering. The light, sound and set came together to create a real sense of uneasiness. It almost had similar traits to a psychological thriller and in some ways it could be described as one; Hieronimo did end up murdering the wrong man because she was in such a mental state that made it easy for her to be misled.
The prominent colour of the play was blue. This emphasised a coldness. When a character died, a plastic bag full of paint was carelessly ripped from a hook hanging above the stage and the paint decorated the white (and unnervingly clean) stage floor with blue splatters. The bag clearly represented life and the way that the bags could be so easily ripped showed how casually the characters were playing with life; as though it had no real value.
One of my favourite parts of the set were the opaque screens that lined the edge of the stage. Behind these screens is where the murders happened, emphasising the physical separation that death causes. For example when Hieronimo sees Horatio dead, she has no physical attachment to his body as it is behind the screen. Instead the audience are drawn to a disturbing scene that shows Hieronimo covering herself in Horatio’s spilled blood. The feeling of isolation that death can bring was vividly prominent and the imagery of the play was incredibly poetic at times.
The cast were very talented. Each had their own very individual character giving the play a real diversity that I haven’t seen in a long time. Leo Wan (Revenge) was particularly strong as was Janet Etuk (Lorenzo). Throughout the play I was filled with a feeling of eeriness and intrigue which was largely due to the actors’ presence.
This production was incredibly engaging and its combination of set, sound and light are worth taking note of. It could all be described as very simple but I believe that the way it was used really did give the play a complexity that would not have been in existence otherwise.